Climate Change and You. What do you want your coach to ask you?

Climate change and you: What would you want your coach to ask you?

As coaches, our job is to work with our clients to find the best way forward. We use open questions and deep listening as we explore their reality. We may shy away from raising questions of the wider environment and climate on which our clients depend.

This does a disservice to our profession and the coaching experience.  Our work is an exchange towards answers in a shared context rather than solely an exploration of the client’s concerns.

In the last thirty years, human activity has done more damage to our blue planet than at any other period. We are all affected in one way or another. The decisions we make in our lifetime will determine the future of the human race and many other species.  Your climate (emergency) is mine too.

In years to come as our impact develops, how will our industry be judged if we fail to embrace the wider reality of the context on which we all depend interconnectedly? Will we wring our hands and admit lamely that we didn’t feel it was right to ask?  It perhaps says more about our own uncertainty and confidence than any right or wrong about coaching orthodoxy when we shy from asking questions about climate change and bio diversity.  Last year the industry leaders were unequivocal:

Coaching and mentoring are ultimately concerned with developing the potential of human beings, of raising awareness to enable people to take responsibility for their actions and ownership for their contribution. Coaches have a significant role to play in creating a new way of being in service to a healthy human society and a healthy planet. (AC,APAC,ICF,EMCC, APECS joint statement 2020)

If I was your coach what would you want me to ask you?

We posed this question in recent weeks to several kind interviewees across three continents. You may have been one of 5000 small crowd of viewers of the recordings that have explored how clients and coaches think about coaching and climate. Our work was intended to raise awareness in advance of the Climate Coaching Alliance‘s excellent 24hour workshop. The conversation continues as we prepare for Cop26 and the sense of urgency gathers apace.  The interviews showed us that clients and coaches are ready. More, they were enthusiastic in urging coaches to get on with this issue.

The answers ranged from everyday things that people do and want to do more of, to the need to press policy makers and make connections at the highest  level of industry and policy. As one said: “We need our coaches to challenge us to think more and take action”

So the questions that I have are:

  1. Always: What would clients really like their coaches to be asking about their place in the world and its future?
  2. How can coaching academies better train coach-students to be able to see the whole environmental context in their work?
  3. What will bring down the barriers towards broaching the subject, which is not a “subject” but reality?
  4. How should supervisors adjust their work to ensure that the industry is supervised better?


Covid 19- Confronting our fallibility is as crucial as it is hard

Confronting our fallibility for the good

Covid 19 – confronting our fallibility is as crucial as it is hard

These thoughts are my musings about our fallibility, brought on by time on my hands.

We are all deeply affected by the Covid 19 pandemic. New orthodoxies of behaviour and belief inform our daily lives as policies are rolled out. We know that the policy decisions are made with limited data, understanding of the disease and poor global coordination.  It seems certain that as our understanding improves and the financial and social costs soar we will confront hard questions about whether this is the right way to respond. While acknowledging and confronting fallibility is great in theory, in practice it is hard. As the stakes pile up it gets harder.

We are afraid and we have all made sacrifices to get on board the lock-down instructions. We follow behavioural guidance to avoid infection. As we do the challenge is to remain  open-minded to the real possibility that experts we have listened to and agreed with are fallible and have been wrong or muddled in their thinking.  

Confronting our fallibility is crucial. In science, it informs new questions and makes us look for new answers. In politics it enables the weighing up of the relative merits of courses of action against ideologies. Normally these take place at slow pace with more time to assess and reflect. Now we are moving at high speed meaning the margin of error is far greater.

There are two layers of risk to consider. The first is the risk that the experts refused to reconsider, review discuss and adjust deepening our losses further. The second is that fear of a loss of face and backlash against the experts and decision-makers acts as a barrier to full review and reconsideration. 

Too much information?

Every day there are new graphs and information showing the scale, spread and death rate, but I cannot honestly say I am informed. The information  creates fear but not judgement. For instance, I have no idea how the reported deaths compare with others that effect excess deaths. I know there are 100,000 deaths each year from strokes and  23,200 excess deaths were recorded in UK 2018/19. The age range spread looks very similar to those were seeing from Covid 19.  I suspect others are the same as hits on Google for Corona Virus are over 9.5billion while for excess deaths its around 81million.

Obviously, public health messaging needs to be clear, easy-to-follow and un-nuanced for compliance, there can be no rooms for the ifs and buts. So we follow the rules to stay home and save lives. Are there alternatives we should consider? Even posing this question right now seems heretical.

A tale of two responses

Two key policy debates are playing out in response to Covid -19. One is a public health response, the other I call a social health response.

If I have understood it properly, the public health response says because people’s lives are at risk, we must do as much as is possible to curtail movement and interaction to prevent contagion. Our health services will thus be better able to cope and more lives will be saved. Containment reduces infection and keeps the flow of patients at a manageable flow. The value driving this is the value of life itself. 

The social health response argues for the need to enable a return to economic and social movement as soon as possible, even if there are still health risks.  It argues that the damage to our – already unequal and shaky – economic systems, to our culture and creativity and community support mechanisms, may suffer irreparable damage during a prolonged period of lock-down. This, in turn, may outweigh the benefits of  saving lives through containment as poverty, social distress and other untreated problems occur. Notwithstanding what we may feel about the politicians espousing the social health response – more on that below – the value that drives this can also be said to be the value of life itself.

I will eat my hat if I am wrong

Presently our knowledge of the virus, how it spreads and who is most at risk is unfolding. It has been widely reported that the data needed to make decisions from testing before and after is limited. It seems clear that such huge disruption and risk to life, health and well being of populations must rest on excellent knowledge of factors beyond only disease control. Graphs depicting the spread of the disease to inform the management of the response have been widely shared. There is no similarly coherent data or modelling regarding the the impact of widespread disruption and social/physical isolation, beyond analysis of the macro economy

Meanwhile, politicians and scientists are staking their futures and their reputations on making cases for one or other of the policy positions. At present the Public Health response is winning, supported by some excellent modelling by Imperial College. As it gains traction new social and political taboos are developing backed with legal enforcement mechanisms.  It’s hardly surprising that questioning the response meets with hostility and fear.  But this is risky.

Dr John Ioannidis of Stanford University in a recent interview argues strongly against blame and the need to win arguments. He points out excellent science is both excellent and flawed.  Opening up to peer review and ongoing challenge is central to scientific progress and quality.  Scientific models are just that: models. 

More than one hat?

The public health risk response of the current magnitude also affects social systems beyond health. A wider range of scientific studies is needed to make judgements so that our current thinking can be supported with studies modelling the varied impact of whole community shut-down on other health and well being, education and skills and  productivity for the future, through and beyond Covid -19.  Data of these other considerations need to be seen alongside the health models.  They could perhaps support better decisions making.

China is presumably well placed to provide the kind of reflective, post infection data evaluating and learning from their response. Several people have pointed to the environmental benefits of the lock downs on air quality.  But will a globally depressed economy really be better for tackling environmental sustainability, arguably a threat far greater than Covid -19?  

Herd mentality or herd immunity? Keeping an open mind

The paradox for science, in our present scenario, is we depend on it to guide our thinking even as it is bound to be wrong to some degree. For our democratically elected politicians it is worse. Not only are they fallible and frightened individuals like us, the system that elects them is deeply intolerant of prevarication.  

It is possible that in coming months we will find that mortality rates are lower than at first thought, or that social isolation is more damaging and even kills more – albeit for different reasons- than continued unfettered movement. We may learn that a disappointed and angry population is less willing to respond to pressing and more deadly issues in future. 

Matthew Syed in “Black Box Thinking” demonstrates both how important and how hard it is for powerful figures to admit they have been mistaken.  With this global disruption feeding global depression and widespread misery, the stakes have never been higher. The challenge of the coming months, even as we mourn the dead and struggle to remain as productive as possible, is to remain open to the possibility that we are fallible and may have got it wrong. Imagining it is the first step.

Knowing Me Week 9 Dream For A New You

Knowing Me Week 9 – Dream for a new you!

Dec 2019 From pausing to consider the over-consumption of chocolate, to thoughts of changing career, the solstice is a the season of reflection. Imagining how things can be different is the start change.

This week we will draw on the work of the late Steve de Shazer and I will invite you try something new. Its a bit like magic! 

The time is now!

For northern hemisphere dwellers, 22nd December 2019 will be the shortest day of the year. For the southern hemisphere it’s the longest. The earth’s oceans will swell and fall to their highest and lowest points at this time. This key moment in the year has for centuries been a time of celebration, feasting and reflection. More recently, all over the world people use the New Year to make decisions to reflect on habits and ambitions they want to change.  What are yours?

Are you comfortable? Then let’s go on a journey of the imagination

Although I have referred to yuletide, this exercise is not astrological and can be done at any time of the year.  Take your pen and paper and think about something that gets in the way of your success in life that you would like to change.  (If you have none you may like to run the Knowing Me week 1-8 exercises!).

Once you have thought of something, pause and try to experience it completely: Visualise it – what do you see happening;  listen to it – what can you hear happening; feel it how does it make you feel. Finally, consider how long it has rested within you.

Now, imagine yourself at home, completing all the last tasks of the day and retiring to bed. Notice the details of your actions as completely as possible and watch yourself asleep.

As you sleep, some yuletide magic occurs and that something that you want to change is miraculously gone!  You have no idea how, you just know when you open your eyes that this is so.

Think for a moment and write down: how is life different now on this new morning? Write down as much that is changed that you can think of in detail. Read over what you have written.

As you read, think of your closest friend. What difference would they experience in you after that magic sleep? Write down as much that is changed that you can think of in detail.

Three questions for reflection 

1. Ask yourself if or when you last felt like this new you

2. Thinking about the new you as 10/10 what score you give yourself now between 0-10 of where you stand now.

3. What one thing could you do to move you a step nearer to 10/10

Happy 2020

For more about the project and links to all the previous wonderful weeks look here.  Contact me to take the next step!